TONE3000

Dual Rectifier 4 Tubes vs 2 Tubes

Amp Head Capture

NAM

bhindman's avatar

bhindman

1 month ago

Description

For curious Dual Rec owners, 100w vs 50w: four tubes vs pulling two tubes, silicon rectifier TL;DR 50w has less bass and more mid bark. Pic is of a match EQ set to 200% match, to visually highlight the tonal change To me it feels less compressed, but since it's louder when normalized to peak, it's probably technically more compressed. I think the feeling comes from the upper mid boost emphasizing pick attack. Whatever's causing it, it feels more fun and alive to me, even when you take a minute to level-match Methodology: Didn't touch any knobs between captures, just pulled two tubes (and one rectifier - not applicable in this scenario), and switched the output jack to compensate for the change in resistance. Normalized to peak—as expected, the 50w take was boosted roughly 3dB by normalizing

Tags

Preview

0:00 / 0:00
Model
Input
IR

Powered by

Models

Each model captures the gear at specific settings.

ESR: 0.0036

Epochs: 898

Sweep Signal

Standard

Captured on

Tone3000 - NAM Captures and IRs

ESR: 0.0036

Epochs: 1000

Sweep Signal

Standard

Captured on

Tone3000 - NAM Captures and IRs

License: T3K

Users may download and use the data file in software and publish the resulting outputs without royalties or restrictions. However, they may not upload, republish, or distribute the data file without the author's permission.

Use Your Tones

Load NAM files and IR's from TONE3000 onto a free plugin or compatible pedal.